Cases of the best female advocate in Lahore

Cases of the best female advocate in Lahore:

Advocate Jamila the best female advocate in Lahore from a law firm in Pakistan has some important technical cases to discuss. The Provincial Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct powers exercisable by it under this Ordinance or the rules made there under, shall in circumstances, area, and under such circumstances declare the best female advocate in Lahore from a law firm in Pakistan.

If any specified in the notification, be exercisable by an officer or authority.  The effect of non-registration of a power-of-attorney was also considered, among other things, by the Gauhati High Court in Sardar Bir Singh v. Noor Ahmed. The Notary Public is not a civil servant; hence he cannot guarantee civil servants' availability under the Constitution. It terminated the appointment of a Notary Public not for misconduct, but because he did not satisfy the conditions prescribed in the Rules, it could not challenge his removal for not being allowed to be heard in defense because in such case, no investigation into facts is required.

Click For More Details

Click For More Details

Click For More Details

Click For More Details

Click For More Details

In a case of Advocate Jamila the best female advocate in Lahore from a law firm in Pakistan t was held that the appointment had been made for an indefinite period, and before coming into force of the Rules under which action was taken against him is of no avail, and the Provincial Government could still remove him under Section 16.Power to remove vested in Government is not arbitrary; Removal can be ordered only on sufficient cause, Notaries Ordinance, 1961, Section 16.- Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 empowered the Federal Government to make rules consistent with the Act, nor the guidance and control of Notaries Public appointed under the Act. 

Through the best female advocate in Lahore from a law firm in Pakistan it was held that under Section 138 of the Act of 1881, it gave Power to the Government to remove by the issuance Simpliciter of a notification. But it is erroneous to think that the Act's Power was like a naked power without any limitation of any kind. It was. He held that: Given the clear and categorical provisions of Section 16 of the Notaries Ordinance of 1961 saving the appointments made under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, it is difficult to accept the contention that notwithstanding the saving clause the Government could, at its sweet will, revoke an appointment made under the previous law without any cause. Such an interpretation by the best female advocate in Lahore from a law firm in Pakistan of the provisions of a saving clause will amount to rendering the saving clause itself nugatory.

That the office of a Notary Public is also an office of profit is clear from the rules framed under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the Ordinance of 1961 themselves, which prescribe scales of fee livable by Notaries Public for the functions to be performed by them. The removal of a Notary Public amounts, therefore, to the removal of a person holding a public office and to depriving him of valuable rights which accrue to him as an incumbent of that office. The rules are that a person should not be deprived of his vested rights except for sufficient cause.
 

As such, there may be areas about which Islamic law regarding divorce law in Pakistan through law firms in Pakistan may be silent. The cavities have to be filled. It can do this through the dynamic principle of ijtihäd, which, in the terminology of Islamic law, means re-interpretation of the Shari 'ah by reasoning to form an opinion on a legal question not specifically stated in the Qur'an and Sunnah, keeping in view the spirit of the Shari and the needs of the society. Consequently, there can be no ijtihäd that violates the principles established in the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH). Going beyond the mandate of the Qur'an and Sunnah would not be acceptable to the people if the rules to be formulated are inconsistent with the religious beliefs.  It is discernable from the previous discussion that whereas Sharüah guarantees democracy and human rights, they remain illusory in practice in Iliost of the Muslim countries.

An overwhelming majority of the Muslim states' actual practice shows that it has not materialized when it comes to their implementation for divorce law in Pakistan through law firms in Pakistan. A brief survey of adherence to those obligatory aspects of Islamic precepts in Muslim countries, such as creating democratic institutions. The guarantee of human rights and the establishment of justice, crime, and the corruption-free virtuous societies, will reveal that Muslim societies are undemocratic and, in essence, un-Islamic. Therefore, we cannot blame Islam if Islamic societies do not practice what Islam obligates them to do