London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.
London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against the embattled liquor tycoon. Rose Capital Ventures (RCV), a British Virgin Islands firm linked to the Mallya family trust which owns the Cornwall Terrace property in central London, had made an application in the London High Court which was heard last Friday. Judge Simon Rainey QC ruled that the refinancing is a "permissible transaction" as it meant investment in a prime London property. "The proposed realisations are proper," the judge noted. The legal battle by Mr Mallya and co-defendants - his mother Lalitha and son Sidhartha Mallya - to hold on to the Cornwall Terrace apartment overlooking Regent's Park in London dates back to March 2017 when the five-year term on a loan from Swiss Bank UBS expired. The bank then proceeded to redeem the GBP 2.4 million unpaid amount of the loan, which was taken out by RCV. At a hearing in 2020, the London court confirmed that RCV re-financing its UBS loan was permitted under the WFO as it was in the ordinary and proper course of RCV's business. That application, however, did not consider the realisation of investments owned by Mallya trust entities to enable that loan to be made to RCV. UBS, which also managed the investments that were to be used, refused to allow those realisations because it feared that doing so might be a breach of the WFO. RCV therefore brought an application for confirmation that the realisations were permitted to enable the repayment of the UBS loan.London: The family of Vijay Mallya will be able to hold on to their luxury London home after a UK court ruled that refinancing of a loan by a family trust firm would not be in breach of the worldwide freezing order (WFO), in place against
- Water from the Karam dam has started rushing out of the two bypass channels created after sustained efforts
- The fisherwoman, who used to earn her living by selling seaweed, was allegedly sexually assaulted by a group of men
- Anushka Sharma was left amazed after her husband, cricketer Virat Kohli grabbed a catch one-handedly during the
- Due to the unwillingness of the Ukrainian side to influence nationalists or extend the ceasefire, offensive actions have